MEN'S NEWS DAILY HOME PAGE


Wednesday, September 07, 2005

Questions That May Not be Asked about New Orleans

By Nicholas Stix In journalism as in academia, the most important questions one has to learn are those which one may not ask. For instance, back in April on Bob Costas’ HBO sports show, football announcer Chris Collinsworth, a white, retired Cincinnati Bengals wide receiver, stuttered and stammered as he said that he is so nervous about touching professionally on race in any way, because it could instantly end his announcing career, that he is afraid to ask any race-related questions. In grad school, I was always struck by how some of my classmates knew exactly what questions not to ask. I wondered if someone was handing out fliers that I wasn’t receiving. One question that nowadays may never be asked in academia is, “Why, if black IQs are on average 15 points lower than white IQs, and the Constitution forbids unequal treatment under the law, would the government routinely hire people based on their being black, rather than based on their being qualified?” It’s a non-question; no one may ask it. Forget that you even read it here. In that spirit, I have a compiled a series of “non-questions” regarding New Orleans. They only appear to be questions but aren’t, because no one may ask them. I am not asking them; thus, no answer is expected. I am merely listing them as a public service, so that everyone will know what he may not ask. 1. Why were New Orleans residents shooting at rescue workers in helicopters and boats, and firing on the contractors who were trying to fix the levee? 2. Why were so many thugs shooting and looting and raping and murdering (and carjacking) on the streets of New Orleans and at the Superdome when a natural disaster hit town? 3. Is it true that the thugs who were shooting and looting and raping and murdering and carjacking were just doing what they do all time in “the Big Easy”? 4. Why were virtually all of the looters and shooters and murderers and rapists and carjackers black? 5. Since it is a well-known fact that blacks can only be the victims, but never the perpetrators of racism, should we damn as racists the white and Asian foreign tourists who said they were being terrorized in the Superdome and on the streets of New Orleans based on the color of their skin, ignore their complaints, “disappear” alleged black-on-white and black-on-Asian crimes committed in the aftermath of Katrina, and arrest the tourists for racial insensitivity and hate crimes? 6. Why didn’t New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin use the 500 or so school and city buses he had at his disposal to evacuate New Orleans residents before Katrina hit town? 7. Is President Bush getting so roundly criticized by the media and black political activists for not taking over rescue efforts sooner, because he is a white, heterosexual, Republican male, whereas Mayor Nagin is a black Democrat and Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco is a female Democrat? 8. Had Pres. Bush, in the face of Mayor Nagin and Gov. Blanco’s incompetence, taken over rescue efforts days ago, would the President now be enduring the same criticisms he is now receiving, or worse criticisms? 9. Although thousands of National Guard troops have been in New Orleans for several days, how come we have not heard of any of them shooting looters or violent criminals? 10. Why have we heard instead of New Orleans thugs beating National Guardspersons over the head with pipes, shooting National Guardspersons, and of wounded National Guardspersons running away from said attackers? 11. Are the National Guardspersons’ rifles loaded with live ammunition? 12. Is it possible that, as with during and after the 1992 Los Angeles race riots, thousands of National Guardspersons are marching around New Orleans with unloaded weapons? 13. How can federal authorities such as FEMA take over the role of first-responders, as critics of the feds have implied they should have, if the police and fire persons are all locals, and it takes days for FEMA to arrive on the scene? 14. If everything to do with New Orleans’ troubles is a federal affair, should not the federal government put the city in federal receivership, and render Mayor Nagin and Gov. Blanco powerless, regarding the city’s management? 15. Should we ignore the New York Times’ years-long, successful opposition (including just last spring) to the feds spending billions of taxpayer dollars to fix New Orleans’ levees, in light of the newspaper’s current charges of federal negligence for not having fixed the levees? As I said at the outset, the above sentences are non-questions. They are not to be asked, let alone answered, least of all by yours truly. They are all off-limits – if you know what’s good for you! In fact, forget you ever read this column.

6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Great non answers forth coming?

9/07/2005 06:57:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Funny, these are exactly the same questions I've been asking for days now.

So this explains why everyone is so mad at me!


Fanaticism: "fa·nat·i·cism (fa-năt'ĭ-sĭz'm)
n.
Excessive, irrational zeal."


Seems many are stuck in a blame rut.

9/07/2005 07:56:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

All this remember me a maxim: Questions enslave you and answers make you free.

I hope we will hear some interesting answers to these questions in the near future.

9/10/2005 07:19:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Another Question: The comparisons by black leaders of the media's handling of black looters vs. white looters suggests that white looters were held blameless and reported to only be getting food.
Did anyone even see a white looter (Im sure they existed, I just didn't see one)
And, if there was even one white man carrying a TV, don't you know that the video would have been the lead story on all news, as the media used it to "dampen" the image of black looters and make it look like it was a 50/50 deal?

9/10/2005 11:15:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I blogged about the Anglosphere press reports on anti-white bias crimes in the Superdome long before CNN mentioned "racial tensions".

You can see my coverage from Sept 2 at
http://scoopster.typepad.com/scoopster/2005/09/hate_crimes_at_.html

9/10/2005 12:40:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Your questions about race are understandable, but you need a longer view. As we could see in Baghdad after our catastrophic success, lawless behavior is not uncommon if there is no law enforcement in places where there are stark cultural (racial, religious or tribal) or class divides. Black communities in the US generally suffer a plague of crime, both because they are under-policed and lack sufficient employment opportunities.

How do we heal the divides? Not easy as mankind is instinctively tribal.

Even where the divides are not stark, the disadvantaged are of course the ones who suffer the most in disasters. There was no looting after the Kobe earthquake, but the fires kept burning for days in one area which was relatively underdeveloped and known as a ghetto for Japan's pariah class, the "Burakumin" - due to greater wooden structures and less developed firefighting infrastructure.

Majority groups may also take victimize minorities when there is disorder - I understand that imported Korean workers were killed during the fires and other disruption that followed earthquakes in old, feudal-era Tokyo.

I'm interested more in your point 15. Was the NYT specifically against the levee defense of NO, or against the other pork-barrel projects in Lousinana (as in this recent piece ), or were they banging the drum on the need to find ways to use some of the Mississippi's silt to replenish the rapidly eroding wetlands that used to protect NO and the Gulf from hurricanes?

9/16/2005 04:53:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home



Site Meter